This past week the East Coast was hit by Hurricane Sandy.
The devastation was largely centered in New Jersey and NYC, with several other
areas experiencing dramatic effects. My heart goes out to those in Sandy’s path
and to families who lost their homes and loved ones.
We started to learn of Sandy’s direction several days in
advance, and over and over again we saw the projected track of the storm,
pictured as a cone, broadcast on the news. The pathway was uncertain, and as
the predictions extended beyond a few days, the cone width became wider and
wider. This led governors and mayors to issue edicts to citizens who
potentially might take a hit: Stay indoors or evacuate. It wasn’t until the
storm was right on top of us that we had a certainty of its devastation.
There are some important parallels to how managers and
leaders must run their businesses. Businesses operate in a state of
uncertainty. The attempt at prediction of future events is an important
function of a good manager and leader. I am surprised how infrequently managers
and leaders plan or consider the possibility of events — good or bad.
Griffin1 describes management as a combination of
several functions: “Planning and Decision Making, Organizing, Controlling and
Leading.” The process of prediction is integrated in all of these areas.
For example, businesses need to develop a set of goals that
should be related to its vision and strategies for the future. Planning should
not only include the setting of the goals but also how to achieve them. The old
axiom rings true: Proper Planning Prevents Poor Performance.2 But
what is proper planning? I propose that proper planning has two components. One
set of plans relates to what leaders know. That is, the National Weather
Service knew Hurricane Sandy was coming and plans were set in motion
based on “what is to be done when a storm is coming.” The second set of plans
should consider what is not known. This is referred to as scenario planning or
analysis3. This kind of “what-if thinking” is different in that it
considers the full range of possible events and outcomes. For Sandy, the “what
if” was focused on where Sandy would hit land and what destruction it might
cause at that spot and nearby. Thinking about these issues caused even more
government action to prevent death and injuries.
One business parallel is the yearly budgeting ritual. By
this time of year, most 2013 budgets are well under way or have been approved.
Each unit considers what was planned and budgeted for the current year, makes
adjustments based on reality and supplements with expected needs. Emerging from
this information is a budget plan. This type of planning is based on what is
known and what is desired for the future. Leaders and managers, however,
also need to consider the unknown. This second part requires “what-if
forecasting,” and managers and leaders at all levels of the organization need
to be involved.
Here are some ideas of how this could work in practice:
- Since
the salesperson needs to achieve sales targets regardless of conditions on
the ground, any potential roadblocks or barriers need to be considered and
planned for. Imagine, for example, that a new competitor releases a
competitively priced higher-quality product, and suddenly the best seller
in your company's portfolio is no longer in the lead.
- A call
center manager must consider the possibility of events that might destroy
service. For example, what should the manager do if 50 percent of the
staff is out with the flu? Customer satisfaction directly influences
revenues and profits.
- Businesses
often use outsourcing as a tool to focus on core internal strengths. What
if a vendor shuts down (today)? It is always within the realm of
possibility that a vendor is suddenly “padlocked.” Should this occur, what
will the business do? This can have a huge financial impact.
- Some
businesses require more planning than others. Healthcare facilities, for
example, require much more attention to scenarios of risk. Consider that
Bellevue Hospital was forced to evacuate during Hurricane Sandy.
- The
Internet has created a new set of worries. What if negative publicity goes
viral?
Therefore, the budget process is one method leaders can use
to get everyone to consider potential events and consequences. Another approach
is to construct a serious Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process that is
executed by a senior-level committee3. In such a committee, its
members step out of their traditional roles to contemplate the inherent risks
in the business. This should be an action-oriented process with required
deliverables and results. A committee I served on maintained a list of all
relevant risks (ranked by impacts) and we worked on either mitigation or
removal of the risk. In some cases, we used the process to monitor known risks
across the business. The article by Barton, Shenkir and Walker offers some
guidance to start the process.3
It is not hard to imagine how deep the desolation would have
been if some degree of planning had not taken place prior to Hurricane Sandy.
So far I have addressed the planning and decision-making
components of management's responsibility should disaster occur. The organizing component is also required.
One plan that needs significant organization is disaster recovery. Not only is
a formal documentation of the process required, but all essential personnel
should know exactly what to do should an event occur. For years I had a
disaster kit at my home; it contained instructions of whom to contact and how.
Disaster plans should be revisited annually.
The control component
is also about planning. Planning creates some semblance of control by providing
a set of actions.
The last component, leadership,
is about inspiring the need for such plans and earning buy-in to practice and
revisit such plans. Everyone will grumble until the plan is actually needed;
this is when everyone suddenly realizes how good the leader was at having the
foresight to be ready.
My family was fortunate in the hurricane. We lost power, but
our neighbor allowed us to tap into his generator. I am thankful it was not
worse and also pleased at what appeared to be a group of prepared communities
and state governments up and down the East Coast. The results were still awful, but I think without some solid
plans in place, it would have been much worse.
Leaders must ask themselves one important question. How
ready is the business should some unknown negative (or positive) event take
place?
If you have comments, let me know.
References
1
Griffin, R.W. (2011). Management (10th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western
Cengage Learning.
2 Author unknown. This is
also known as the 5 Ps. I recall this phrase being used when I was in a sales
position early in my career. Wikipedia connects the phrase to a British Military
phrase (7 Ps).
3 Barton, T.L., Shenkir,
W.G., & Walker, P.L. (2001). Managing Risk: An Enterprise-wide Approach. Financial
Executive, March/April, 48-50. Electronically Retrieved 11-2-12 at:
http://shc-staffweb.hct.ac.ae/skhartabil/Skhartabil/TEACHING%20RESOURCES/Principles%20of%20Finance/Prin.%20Corporate%20Finance%28Brealey%29/others/body10.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment